Despite the fact that only roughly a third of engineering PhD earners enter academic jobs, engineering graduate programs largely provide coordinated professional development only for tenure-track roles. As shown in this study, PhD and postdoc advisors are no different. This paper presents a subset of findings from a larger study of semi-structured interviews with 20 advanced (4th+ year) PhD students and postdocs to understand how their graduate and postdoctoral experiences influenced their career interests. Ten were interested in a tenure-track faculty job and ten were not. Here, we focus on advisors providing career advice and if participants felt comfortable discussing their career plans with their advisors. All ten of the participants interested in tenure-track faculty jobs received advice from their advisors–often, quite extensively through mock interviews and application materials feedback. In contrast, only four of the participants disinterested in tenure-track faculty jobs received any career advice from their advisors. Four participants did not feel comfortable talking with their advisors about their career interests largely because of perceptions that their advisors were unsupportive of non-tenure-track careers. Even if advisors personally lack non-academic work experience, part of inclusive mentorship is providing an environment where graduate students and postdocs feel comfortable discussing all types of career plans and helping connect mentees to helpful resources. This paper discusses how advisors can do that, as well as advice for graduate students on how to find additional mentors for career guidance.