This paper critiques the epistemic injustice inherent in traditional engineering and engineering education, where rigid epistemic boundaries marginalize alternative ways of knowing. Engineering’s dominant status in the knowledge hierarchy—rooted in technical problem-solving, technological change, and value-neutrality—has fostered an “engineering egosystem” reinforcing epistemic exclusion. This egosystem prioritizes self-preservation over interconnectedness, undervaluing diverse knowledge forms and perpetuating epistemic hierarchies favoring scientific and technical disciplines.
I propose shifting from an egosystemic to an ecosystemic approach to engineering knowledge to address this phenomenon. This approach dismantles rigid boundaries by fostering interdisciplinarity, intersectionality, and transdisciplinarity and integrating multicultural perspectives into engineering education. This paper advocates for embedding interconnectedness, compassion, humility, and openness within engineering practices to promote epistemic justice. By doing so, engineering education can become more inclusive and socially responsive, addressing real-world challenges through more diverse and equitable knowledge systems.
This call to action underscores the need for policy reforms and transformative learning experiences that challenge dominant epistemologies and promote social innovation. By integrating marginalized voices and recognizing the relational nature of knowledge, epistemic justice offers a framework for reshaping engineering education and practice to reflect global communities' diverse realities and needs.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025