2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

An Evaluation of Student Responses to a Fluid Mechanics Concept Inventory

Presented at ME Division 8: Measuring What Matters: Concept Inventories, FE Exam, and Learning Skills

A concept inventory is a valuable tool to assess a student's grasp of specific concepts within a course. In this study, we utilized the Fluid Mechanics Concept Inventory (FMCI) in a mandatory Fluid Mechanics course at a large southeastern university offering an undergraduate Mechanical Engineering program. The FMCI comprised 30 multiple-choice questions, each with three to five options. To gather data, we administered the inventory on campus for 60 minutes in a 75-minute class period during the penultimate week of the semester, with 216 participating students across the Fall 2022, Spring 2023, and Fall 2023 semesters. Our analysis focused on various parameters, including item difficulty, item discrimination, reliability, alpha with items deleted, item response theory, and subscale alpha. The calculated Cronbach's alpha as a measure of reliability was found to be 0.73, and the correlation between the concept inventory and the final exam score was weak. We identified several questions that appeared to warrant removal based on different criteria. Seven questions were suggested for removal when considering the combination of accepted ranges of difficulty (0.3 to 0.9) and discrimination indices (≥0.2), while according to the item-response-theory-analysis criterion, only four questions warranted removal. To ensure comparability with other studies using the same inventory, we used all questions despite the identification of potential removal candidates. We could not perform exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis or diagnostic classification modeling due to the design of the questions, which addressed distinct concepts by fewer than three questions converging on a single concept. This limitation highlights the need for a revised concept inventory to enhance student learning in this area and ensure the effectiveness of our teaching methods.

Authors
  1. Ozge Uyanik University of South Florida [biography]
  2. Dr. Rasim Guldiken University of South Florida [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025

« View session

For those interested in:

  • engineering
  • Faculty
  • New Members
  • undergraduate