The variation of progression rules in Canadian accredited undergraduate engineering programs reveals their impact on student outcomes, emphasizing the necessity for continuous review and adjustment to meet evolving education and professional needs. The information of first-year requirements, promotion rules, university ranking, and student retention was collected for 25 universities. The data was analyzed to compare academic requirements across institutions and assess their impact on student outcomes. The finding reveals variations in first-year requirements and promotion rules, demonstrating universities’ autonomy in setting academic standards. While there is no noticeable correlation between academic requirements and university reputation, it highlights the important aspect of addressing student retention and mental health through initiatives to improve the sense of belonging and increased support services. Overall, the contrasting relationship between academic requirements, university ranking, and student satisfaction indicates the need for a thorough comprehension of the factors impacting student well-being.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.