2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Evaluating the Importance of Inclusive Teaching in STEM Faculty Hiring

Presented at Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 10

This research paper describes a study designed to help inform STEM faculty hiring practices at institutions of higher education in the U.S. The purpose is to explore how incumbent faculty members evaluate the importance of STEM faculty applicants’ teaching ability. The research question that guided this study is: How important to search committee members are qualifications related to inclusive teaching practices in STEM faculty hiring? We were interested in understanding how – or if – the introduction of a diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) related construct impacted respondents’ evaluation of the importance of teaching qualifications for entry level tenure track and non-tenure track STEM faculty applicants. Therefore, we examined how participants evaluated the importance of applicants’ ability to implement inclusive teaching practices versus the importance of their ability to deliver high quality teaching.

This paper is derived from a larger two-phase sequential mixed methods study examining the factors current faculty members and administrators consider when hiring new STEM faculty members. During the first phase, we launched a nationwide survey to current STEM faculty members and administrators. The second phase was an interpretive qualitative study involving interviews of survey participants to explore selected quantitative findings more deeply.

Quantitative results indicated a statistically significant difference in how incumbent faculty and administrators rated the importance of high quality teaching and inclusive teaching. Specifically, the ability to deliver high quality teaching was rated as highly important while the ability to implement inclusive teaching strategies was rated as significantly less important. This held true when survey respondents were asked about both tenure track and non-tenure track STEM faculty applicants as well as when we examined the data based on institutional characteristics (i.e., Carnegie Classification, Minority-Serving Institution status). Because of the dichotomy between respondents’ evaluation of high quality teaching and inclusive teaching, we conducted interviews to understand how participants viewed these constructs. Preliminary qualitative results indicate that while many STEM faculty believe that high quality teaching and inclusive teaching are one in the same and that high quality teaching requires inclusive teaching, some faculty differentiated high quality teaching from inclusive teaching by reasoning that high quality teaching is related to end of course evaluations.

Shared through traditional lecture, results from this study may help inform strategies for recruiting faculty members who are committed to inclusive teaching practices, addressing inequities in faculty hiring processes, and sharing insights from search committees with prospective faculty members to aid in their preparation for the job search.

Authors
  1. Dr. Torrie A. Cropps The University of Texas at Dallas [biography]
  2. Jue Wu University of California, Berkeley
Download paper (1.93 MB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.

» Download paper

« View session

For those interested in:

  • computer science
  • engineering
  • Faculty
  • Graduate