In this paper we describe a tri-university study that focuses on increasing the equitable attainment of engineering degrees and improving four-year graduation rates in five engineering disciplines; a challenge that is increasingly difficult at four-year institutions. Using Kotter’s Change Model to guide this study, we (1) evaluate how various engineering disciplines differ regarding the curriculum and instruction they tend to offer, (2) measure how the differences in curriculum and instruction between disciplines impact time-to-degree and student success across student demographic groups, and (3) evaluate the systemic inequities built into the respective engineering disciplines due to curricular structure and/or instructional design. To accomplish these aims, we first collected curricular structure, student performance, and demographic data which identified equity gaps that showed the urgent need to address demographic discrepancies between state, university, and engineering discipline populations. This data identified inequities leading to delayed graduation, however, data and analytics alone is not enough to catalyze change.
Next, we describe how we built a guiding coalition by establishing learning communities to empower faculty to create impactful change in curricular structure and design to improve four-year graduation in engineering disciplines. These learning communities are made up of faculty across five engineering disciplines at the University of Arizona, the University of California San Diego, and the Georgia Institute of Technology. Faculty in the learning communities discuss data including curricular complexity, student progress and outcomes, student demographics, factors impacting time-to-degree, and institution-specific characteristics to collaboratively identify areas and mechanisms to improve equitable attainment of engineering degrees. Through these discussions faculty develop a vision and strategy for addressing equity gaps and improving four-year graduation rates in engineering disciplines.
By communicating this vision and strategy to provosts, vice chancellors, deans, and department heads from participating universities we can remove obstacles such as data and analytics support at each institution. Empowering faculty to be the catalyst for change creates short term wins and consolidates long term gains. Moving forward we will continue to institutionalize positive changes within the cultures of our universities. In this session, we will share best practices in learning community formation and training as well as results showing how demographic and complexity factors are linked to time to degree and on time graduation.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.