Graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) play a significant role in shaping the learning experiences of undergraduate students. However, their potential as higher education practitioners is often hindered by a lack of training opportunities and support systems (Verleger & Diefes-Dux, 2013). When limited opportunities do exist, they often fail to address the specific needs of different disciplines, despite the clear necessity for discipline-specific training (Bubbar et al., 2017). To meet this need, a program was developed to train GTAs in the Faculty of Engineering at a Canadian university. This program is facilitated by an experienced instructional coach, and consists of four themes: 1) Philosophy of Teaching and Learning; 2) Fostering Learning Opportunities; 3) Designing Courses for Learning; and 4) Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, each comprising three modules. Each module includes specific objectives, selected readings, video cases, podcasts featuring experts, reflective questions, and opportunities for the GTAs to develop and submit their own products related to the module topics. Additionally, every module includes a one-hour synchronous Community of Practice (CoP) session guided by the instructional coach. GTAs dedicate approximately 4-6 hours per week for four months to this immersive program. The conceptual framework for this study is based on situated learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991), which postulates that learning occurs as a result of socially and culturally embedded interactions and relationships (Ebbers, 2015; Vermunt, 2014).
This case study aims to explore the perspectives of GTAs in terms of their overall experiences, learnings, and challenges during their participation in the program. The study was conducted from January to April 2023, involving two cohorts of 20 GTAs from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. The program was delivered through the university's online course platform, and six GTAs with varying teaching experiences volunteered for the study. Data was collected through individual interviews and a focus group discussion conducted at the conclusion of the program. The collected data underwent qualitative thematic analysis following the method suggested by Braun and Clarke (2006).
The findings revealed that the GTAs highly appreciated the opportunities offered by the training program. This included engaging with teaching and learning concepts, learning techniques to implement student-centered pedagogy, and recognizing the importance of CoPs and the value of learning as a community. GTAs also highlighted the tensions between what is being taught in the program and their practices as GTAs. Specifically, they emphasized the significance of tailored pedagogical content that aligns with their specific roles and responsibilities, along with opportunities to put their learning into practice.
Given the high numbers of GTAs and their often overlooked roles in higher education, there is a need to rethink about GTA’s roles and responsibilities in university labs and classrooms to enhance undergraduate students’ learning experiences. This study provides the first evaluation of a program designed to enhance GTAs’ understanding about teaching and learning and their educational practices. The results indicate that supporting the development of GTAs’ educator identity in this manner can help them to plan and apply better educational practices earlier in their teaching careers.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.