2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Board 248: Developing a National Framework for Recognition of Engineering and Engineering Technology Faculty Instructional Excellence

Presented at NSF Grantees Poster Session

For more than 100 years, there have been calls at a variety of levels for faculty who teach in the fields of engineering and engineering technology (EET) to be trained in the best approaches to teach their students. And while this call begins has begun to be to be answered in some countries across the globe, in the US the professional development in teaching for EET faculty is sparse, at best.

One main reason for the lack of professional development of EET faculty as it relates to teaching is that the current reward systems in the US do not always value this training. In response to the 100 year old call, ASEE formed a Task Force on Faculty Teaching Excellence a few years ago with a main charge of developing a system where EET faculty can be recognized for their professional development in teaching.

Through an NSF-IUSE grant with the title “Developing a National Framework for Recognition of Engineering and Engineering Technology Faculty Instructional Excellence”, the Task Force has engaged with a variety of constituencies within ASEE (e.g., various divisions and councils), at a variety of events (e.g., sectional meetings, council meetings, annual meetings), using a variety of approaches (e.g., ASEE Town Hall, ASEE Prism, ASEE videos, exhibition booth) and a variety of feedback mechanisms (e.g. focus groups, surveys and Town Hall feedback). This education, engagement and feedback strategy has led the Task Force to develop (and modify) a draft three-level framework to recognize faculty professional development in teaching. The framework drafted is structured in a hierarchical approach, where knowledge (Level 1) creates the foundation, application (Level 2) demonstrates the use of the knowledge gained and leadership (Level 3) looks to expand the impact beyond an individual and their own students.

In this poster presentation, we describe the past efforts of the Task Force, the modifications made in the original framework based on feedback and the current draft framework with the three-level structure.

Authors
  1. Dr. Donald P. Visco Jr. The University of Akron [biography]
  2. Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter Campbell University [biography]
  3. Dr. Alan Cheville Bucknell University [biography]
  4. Dr. Douglas Bohl Clarkson University [biography]
  5. Dr. Jacqueline A. El-Sayed American Society for Engineering Education [biography]
Download paper (929 KB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.