The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) started the Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) in 1980 to facilitate the organization, collection, and reporting of fields of study and program completions. Engineering management was moved in 2000 from CIP 14 (Engineering) to CIP 15 (Engineering/Engineering-related Technologies/Technicians). In so doing, the federal government changed engineering management from an Engineering field of study to an Engineering Technology field.
The fact that this change occurred in 2000 is well documented in the NCES archives. What is not available is why the change was made. As previously discussed by Asgarpoor and Lewis (2022), there are several important reasons that the engineering management community should attempt to reverse this change. This paper explores a strategy for how to request and influence a return to CIP 14.
NCES updates the CIP codes every 10 years in the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). In 2020 NCES used several tools for updating the CIP list, including
• A scan of institutional websites
• Review of ‘Other’ titles that do not currently fit into existing codes
• A survey of IPEDS keyholders.
• Meetings of their Technical Review Panel
• Public response to their Federal Register Notice
Every institution of higher education has a university-designated IPEDS Keyholder. The engineering management academic community can influence NCES through their IPEDS Keyholders, who supply updated information annually. A key part of our recommended strategy is to have a unified story to give to our Keyholders for passing on to NCES. As a community, we can also influence the members of the Technical Review Panel and make responses to Federal Register notices. The process will likely take several years; the next planned CIP update is 2030. The time to start is now.
We outline a recommended strategy where universities work in concert to deliver specific reasons and recommendations, including:
• Why engineering management belongs in CIP 14 (Engineering)
• Maintaining our STEM designation
• The fact that EM is already considered Engineering by ABET and other organizations
We recommend the return of engineering management to CIP 14.3001, which was the pre-2000 CIP code, and which is still available for our use. This paper will report result of activities targeted at learning more about the role that IPEDS keyholders and Technical Review Panels play in the CIP code system. We will identify, contact, and interview such individuals and learn about the intricacies of the process that can help to reclaim CIP 14.3001 for Engineering Management discipline.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.