A recent self-study at [University] revealed that our 2nd and 3rd year retention rates for low-income STEM students are lower than those for our non-low income STEM student body. To address this finding the goal of our SSTEM program is to implement evidence-based best practices to increase retention and graduation rates of low-income academically talented STEM students to levels that match our overall STEM population. To accomplish this goal ADAPT we are seeking to: 1) implement best-practices with regards to cohort development and faculty, peer, and alumni mentoring programs to support the ADAPT Scholars, 2) develop targeted enrichment and mentoring activities focused on developing and nurturing the concept of Adaptive Expertise within our Scholars, 3) integrate new programming specific for low-income students with existing campus supports and activities, and 4) increase departmental and institutional awareness of, and support for, the challenges faced by academically talented, low-income students. We are seeking to determine whether contextualizing our cohort activities around the concept of Adaptive Expertise will both provide a unifying programming theme to maintain cohort engagement, and support students in the application of classroom knowledge in professional practice which will enhance their resiliency and sense of belonging which will positively impact retention. Here we will summarize a series targeted research studies seeking to characterize the levels of adaptiveness measured in low-income and non-low-income STEM undergraduate students using a validated survey instrument, including how adaptiveness may change as STEM students progress through their undergraduate programs.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.