With the U.S. recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, economic inflation, and political scrutiny of a culturally relevant and inclusive curriculum in classrooms, educational institutions have been highlighted as being able to provide equitable and accessible opportunities for historically excluded communities who have suffered, and continue to suffer, in the current context. Within postsecondary education specifically, bold, systemic, and immediate action is necessary to correct unjust systems and to provide minoritized students (MS) (defined in this work as Latinx and African American) with the support they need to succeed academically. Explicitly, higher education initiatives and programs need to address how to dismantle the systems that perpetuate disparities in degree completion between MS and non-minoritized students (non-MS), particularly in the STEM field.
The large disparity in degree completion between MS and non-MS in STEM in the U.S. happens for a confluence of reasons. For one, MS in STEM often report feeling that the teaching and learning environment is not conducive to their engagement in the subject matter because of microaggressions and exclusionary behavior by their peers or faculty, behaviors that are rooted in stereotypes and microaggressions (see Hurtado et al., 2009 for more information). In such learning conditions, STEM classrooms create an unwelcoming culture that does not honor the lived experience of MS seeking to strengthen their knowledge in STEM. However, classroom culture is shown to have a significant impact on MS success in higher education (see Johnson, 2012 for more information). For this reason, postsecondary institutions must intentionally address ways to ensure that all students, of any racial or ethnic background, can realize their full academic potential in STEM.
Faculty play a crucial role in the development of positive (or negative) classroom culture, and there is a need to bring more meaningful faculty engagement into the classroom. To directly address the importance of culture in the classroom for MS success, we will discuss ways in which higher education institutions can develop, implement, and assess professional development programs for STEM faculty. In particular, we will highlight our own professional development program, called The Institute for Meaningful Engagement (TIME), which is a multi-session faculty professional development series integrated into the broader campus community and designed to provide STEM faculty with a curriculum and resources that will enhance inclusion and equity in their teaching and learning spaces. In doing so, we highlight the ways in which a research-oriented project (TIME) provides STEM faculty with the tools and strategies to enhance their pedagogy toward access, equity, and inclusion. Moreover, we highlight how TIME can raise faculty awareness of the classroom and campus culture and practices shape the disparities in the academic success and persistence of MS in STEM, and ways that we can advance access and equity for these students in the STEM field.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.