2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Reimagining Engineering Education and its integration with Research and Innovation - IDEELab

Presented at College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 3

In the twenty-first century, humanity has reached a level of technological appreciation in which even marginal improvements command extraordinary economic value. Consumers willingly pay a premium for incremental gains in speed, convenience, connectivity, or performance. As a result, economic impact scales with technological advancement, so that even a modest early lead can translate into dominance across entire industries, leaving other nations economically locked out through irreversible losses of talent, investment, and supply chains. In these winner-takes-all markets, America faces an unprecedented global rivalry that threatens its long-held preeminence as the vanguard of technology.
At the heart of this struggle lies engineering education. The next generation of technological creators must be cultivated not as passive learners of closed-ended methods, but as active inventors capable of transforming open-ended problems into tangible solutions. Preparing students to innovate, think critically, build creatively, and collaborate across disciplines has become a national imperative. Yet while technology is conceived, matured, and deployed in industry, industry contributes on average only about six percent to university research and development, leaving academic programs structurally detached from the primary environment of innovation. As a result, students graduate with strong theoretical foundations but limited readiness to participate effectively in modern innovation cycles.
This paper introduces a novel model implemented within the Innovation Design and Engineering Education Laboratory, IDEELab, to bridge this divide by embedding industry physically within the educational ecosystem. Industry partners conduct high-value technology innovation projects alongside faculty, undergraduate, and graduate students inside IDEELab. In this co-productive environment, industry derives substantial value by collaborating with a new breed of faculty and students to develop novel technologies and engineering solutions on university premises. From these active innovation efforts, rigorous real-world class projects are derived and integrated across the undergraduate curriculum. In this structure, industry innovation generates curriculum content, ensuring that classroom learning is continuously driven by authentic development. Such engagement accelerates students’ transition into the professional world and reestablishes universities as engines of technological renewal, vital to restoring the United States’ leadership in the global innovation landscape.
For this model to succeed, we fundamentally reengineered university processes, policies, and incentives. The existing system, rooted in federally driven R&D priorities, proved incompatible with sustained industry collaboration. As we transition to a paradigm in which the student is the customer of the university and industry is the customer of the student, new incentive frameworks emerged: Faculty of Innovation and Graduate Innovation Assistants. Their success is measured not only by publications, but by intellectual property creation, engineering impact, and industry partnership outcomes, aligning academic purpose with the nation’s innovation imperative.

Authors
  1. Dr. Haitham El Kadiri Mississippi State University [biography]
  2. Dalton Ross Smith Mississippi State University
Download paper (1.56 MB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.