Significant research has been devoted to enhancing STEM-related pedagogical practices that produce better academic outcomes for undergraduate students from different educational and social backgrounds (Freeman et al., 2014; Kober, 2015; NASEM, 2021; NRC, 2012). Despite the proliferation of researchers across various educational disciplines focused on STEM-related pedagogical practices, less effort has been devoted to systematic analyses of change-related practices and how these studies adopt specific theories of change and their strategies for dissemination. A previous NSF-funded project (Henderson et al., 2011) addressed this gap by conducting a thorough interdisciplinary literature review of research devoted to changes in undergraduate STEM instructional practices, illuminating the various theories of change employed by different scholarly communities to improve undergraduate STEM education. The theoretical insights from this metasynthesis have been a widely cited resource for scholarly communities devoted to STEM-related instructional practices (Dogan, 2023); however, the proliferation of research in the decade plus since its publication requires a new analysis incorporating more recent research. Our NSF ECR project conducts an extensive multi-method metasynthesis of literature published between 2011 and 2023 on strategies for enhancing undergraduate STEM instruction. Specifically, we updated the previous review and examined the change strategies implemented after the publication of the prior work. Through keyword searches in academic databases and Google Scholar (n = 9,262), 414 articles were included after the title and abstract and full-text screening. We conducted qualitative coding on the content of the articles, utilizing key codes from the prior study and developing new ones to capture important dynamics of change initiatives. A team of four team members coded a set of articles collectively and held multiple training sessions to reach adequate reliability for coding all categories (e.g., change strategies, the change agent, the target of change, and the disciplinary patterns; all coding categories will be described in the full paper). Henderson et al.’s (2011) original analysis included (n=191) articles and developed four conceptual categories to illuminate the change strategies employed within the research articles: Disseminating Curriculum and Pedagogy (n=58, 30.4%), Developing Reflective Teachers (n=64, 33.5%), Enacting Policy (n=53, 27.7%), and Developing a Shared Vision (n=16, 8.4%). The team used these conceptual categories to identify any shifts in the change strategy utilized within the 414 articles included in the update. The team found an increase in Disseminating Curriculum and Pedagogy strategies (n=145, 35.4%) and Developing a Shared Vision (n=73, 17.6%), while fewer change agents employed Developing Reflective Teacher strategies (n=121, 29.2%) and Enacting Policy strategies (n=62, 15.0%). The larger paper will discuss the limitations of the four conceptual categories in capturing recent moves in STEM-related strategies, as (n=13, 3.1%) of the updates did not fit within the categories as currently articulated. In addition, the larger paper will also present descriptive statistics on the four change strategies and the research communities producing the articles included in the analysis, along with federal or private funding sources.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4783-4964
University of Colorado Boulder
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026