This full paper reports an evidence-informed academic practice from the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of South Florida that applies Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) to address a recurring challenge in industry-sponsored capstone projects: documentation that is inconsistent across teams and difficult for sponsors and faculty to review efficiently, particularly when multiple design alternatives must be compared and justified. Building on a program-wide systems engineering foundation aligned with the V-model, USF integrates MBSE across the curriculum, from the Professional Formation of Engineers (PFE) sequence, through the two-semester capstone, supported by a Canvas module with curated MBSE and Systems Modeling Language (SysML) project examples. In Capstone I, teams use an MBSE-informed workflow implemented with modeling tools to produce a model-centered “digital thread,” using diagrams and tables that link stakeholder needs, requirements, functions, candidate architectures, trade-study criteria, and verification intent.
Within this workflow, teams document architecture alternatives and conduct trade-off analysis using explicit evaluation criteria tied to requirements, supporting transparent design decisions. Where appropriate, teams also use AI-assisted tools to support requirements refinement and accelerate architecture exploration. The workflow requires an early feasibility check in the form of a high-level system simulation, defined here as a simplified executable representation that validates key functional behavior and interfaces at the system level, rather than detailed component modeling, completed by the end of Capstone I. Observed outcomes and lessons learned are synthesized from sponsor/SME feedback, poster-session evaluator input, including a standardized rubric summarized descriptively using Fall 2025 as an illustrative compiled example, and faculty observations. Across these evidence sources, stakeholders consistently emphasized clearer requirements, stronger decision traceability, more effective stakeholder communication, and increased attention to early verification planning. The paper describes the curricular integration and minimum artifact set, summarizes recurring patterns identified across evidence sources, and outlines next evaluation steps and tooling directions as SysML capabilities evolve.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026