Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) has advanced rapidly, yet scholars and practitioners remain uncertain about how to embed ethical reasoning into AI driven learning contexts. To illuminate current practice, we conducted a systematic review of 25 peer reviewed studies (2021–May 2025) that explicitly taught AI ethics to higher education students. Using PRISMA and Covidence, we extracted information on intervention types, ethics frameworks employed, evaluation methods, and learning outcomes. Most interventions were course level, delivered online or hybrid, and rooted in engineering or computer science disciplines (32%). Interestingly, only 44% of the studies explicitly tied their curricula to an established ethics framework. The most frequently referenced frameworks in the literature were the UNESCO AI Ethics Guidelines, the EU HLEG Trustworthy AI, and ACM’s Code of Ethics, although each appeared in just a few studies. Evaluation methods varied, with mixed methods designs predominant; 20 of the 25 studies (80%) reported substantial improvements in ethical understanding, while 5 studies (20%) revealed gaps in depth, tooling, and institutional support. Our synthesis reveals a disciplinary enthusiasm for ethics in AI Education but a persistent shortage of coherent, philosophically grounded, and consistently applied ethics frameworks. We conclude that a shared, actionable ethics framework –grounded in philosophical traditions– is needed to guide curriculum design, assessment, and stakeholder engagement in AIED.
http://orcid.org/https://0000-0002-0001-2672
University of Florida
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026