Enhancing access to educational and computational resources is critical to fostering innovations in Artificial Intelligence (AI). However, teachers’ misconceptions and limited access to hardware resources, especially in rural or under-resourced areas, often impede effective AI education. Common misconceptions include viewing AI solely as ChatGPT, assuming AI requires cloud computing, believing AI devices are prohibitively expensive, overestimating financial motivations of AI engineers, and perceiving AI as inherently unethical due to potential job loss. Addressing these barriers benefits from hands-on engagement with AI in ways that are accessible, low-cost, and pedagogically meaningful.
To address common teacher misconceptions about AI, this qualitative study investigates how hands-on activities with low-cost, hardware-based Edge AI boards can support conceptual change in K-12 STEM teachers. Grounded in conceptual change theory and postphenomenology, the research analyzes the experiences of nineteen in-service teachers during a six-hour professional development workshop, with a specific focus on seven selected participants. During the process in which teachers interact with an Edge AI learning board with an ESP32 microcontroller, breadboard, a battery, five sensors, and an OLED monitor, data was collected through pre-surveys to identify their initial conception about AI, researcher observations, and the teachers' curriculum implementation plans. Hands-on activities included comparing both non-AI and AI-integrated learning board using Arduino Integrated Development Environment (IDE) and Edge Impulse. Teachers reviewed the AI workflows including data collection, model training, and on-device inference, connecting embedded microelectronics to AI decision-making.
The findings indicate that direct interaction with the hardware engaged teachers in cycles of alterity, seeing the technology as a quasi-other, and hermeneutic relations. The analysis of their implementation plans revealed clear evidence of multistability, where teachers adapted the single Edge AI board for diverse and context-specific purposes within their own teaching subjects. This may indicate a shift from their initial, narrower conceptions of AI to a broader, more applied understanding in terms of AI’s role. The study suggests that experiential, hardware-based professional development may deepen teachers' conceptual understanding and support meaningful classroom integration of AI.
http://orcid.org/https://0000-0002-0001-2672
University of Florida
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026