This paper presents a comprehensive review of published peer-reviewed articles examining the effectiveness of sustainability-related material availability policies in university makerspaces. Specifically, it focuses on three operational approaches: pay-per-use models, quantity limits, and bring-your-own-materials (BYOM) policies. Makerspaces, as hubs for digital fabrication and experiential learning, generate substantial plastic waste, particularly from 3D printing. While institutional interest in sustainability is growing, there remains a notable lack of empirical studies evaluating how these specific policy instruments influence user behavior, material consumption, and environmental outcomes.
The review draws from scholarly publications spanning environmental science, engineering education, and policy studies. It is guided by the Engineering for One Planet (EOP) framework, which promotes the integration of sustainability competencies into engineering curricula. The analysis identifies a persistent gap between theoretical models—such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), circular economy principles, and behavioral change frameworks like the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior—and their practical application in makerspace policy evaluation.
Using thematic categorization, the literature was organized into four domains: (1) theoretical frameworks, (2) empirical studies on makerspace sustainability, (3) policy evaluation and implementation, and (4) measurement instruments. Findings reveal that most existing studies are descriptive case reports or baseline waste audits, with few employing controlled comparisons, longitudinal tracking, or validated behavioral metrics.
Key insights include:
• No experimental studies have assessed the behavioral or environmental impact of pay-per-use, quantity limits, or BYOM policies.
• Informal reuse and sharing practices are common, but their connection to formal policy interventions is undocumented.
• Pedagogical efforts promoting sustainable design and upcycling show promise but are rarely integrated with operational policy changes.
• Equity implications of cost-based policies are underexplored, raising concerns about access and participation.
The paper concludes with a call for future research to prioritize experimental designs, multi-institutional comparisons, and mixed-methods approaches that integrate environmental metrics with behavioral data. It recommends the development of makerspace-specific sustainability models, standardized waste auditing protocols, and policy bundles that combine educational framing with operational rules to maximize impact.
By identifying methodological gaps and proposing a research agenda, it aims to catalyze rigorous evaluation of sustainability policies in makerspaces and contribute to broader efforts in sustainable engineering education. Makerspaces have the potential to serve as transformative platforms for cultivating sustainability mindsets and circularity competencies in future engineers.
http://orcid.org/https://0009-0003-4582-2155
North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (CoST)
[biography]
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2493-2588
North Carolina A&T State University (CoE)
[biography]
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5756-8455
North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University
[biography]
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026