Engineering education often struggles to bridge the gap between classroom learning and real-world engineering practice. In this work, we present a reverse-engineered redesign of a pre-capstone mechanical engineering course, guided by feedback from alumni and industry partners. The goal was to align course outcomes with professional expectations to better prepare students for professional engineering practice.
The redesign focused on aligning course structure, assignments, and evaluation methods with authentic engineering workflows. Traditional written reports were replaced with oral and poster presentations, that mirror design reviews commonly used in professional settings. These changes encouraged students to articulate their design rationale, defend decisions in real time, and collaborate effectively across teams—skills essential for engineering communication and teamwork. In addition, a phase-gated project structure was introduced to promote iterative design and accountability. Each stage required students to justify key design choices before progressing, fostering ownership and responsibility.
To support this transformation, a Lean Engineering module was incorporated to introduce foundational principles such as continuous improvement, waste reduction, Kanban, and the Andon system. These concepts were directly connected to prototype development and process optimization, offering students with practical tools to guide decision-making.
Preliminary outcomes indicate that students demonstrated stronger engagement, deeper understanding of design trade-offs, and improved confidence in presenting technical work. This course redesign illustrates how rethinking assessment strategies—supported by industrial practices and lean principles—can cultivate student ownership and bridge the gap between academic learning and engineering practice.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.