2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Full Paper - The Hidden Labor Market Titles of AI Engineering Education

Presented at DSAI-Session 14: Research Methods, Collaboration Networks, and Learning Analytics

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping how learning happens in engineering, yet many roles that carry out core pedagogical work in AI are not labeled as “teaching.” Across universities, educational technology (edtech) companies, startups, and large technology firms, labor-market titles such as developer educator, AI educator, learning experience designer, and AI product researcher describe roles that encompass education. These roles include designing learning materials, facilitating training, documenting practices, and evaluating learning outcomes.

This study examines how AI engineering education-related job titles are described and operationalized, the roles and responsibilities associated with these titles, and their implications for preparing engineering education graduate students and instructors. A stratified corpus of public job postings from higher education, edtech, and industry teams that support engineering or STEM learning was analyzed using a directed content analysis approach.

The analysis focused on identifying patterns in: (a) pedagogical actions (e.g., design, facilitate, assess, document); (b) required instructional artifacts (e.g., curricula, labs, tutorials, assessment plans); (c) intended learner audiences; (d) delivery contexts and modalities; (e) assessment and evaluation practices; and (f) references to learning science frameworks. Content patterns were examined to identify areas of convergence and divergence in competency expectations using a combination of large language model (LLM)-assisted evaluation and human-led analysis.

Findings highlight how pedagogical work is distributed across sectors and embedded within a range of AI-related roles, often without being explicitly labeled as teaching. These results provide insight into the competencies, artifacts, and practices associated with AI-related educational work and offer guidance for aligning engineering education curricula with emerging workforce expectations.

Authors
  1. Christan Grant Ph.D. University of Florida [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026