2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Mapping Disciplinary Conceptions of Engineering Design Processes in Undergraduate Courses

This full Research paper explores how disciplinary engineering faculty conceptualize the processes and products of ‘engineering design’ in their undergraduate design courses. Design is a ubiquitous concept across engineering education curricula and literature. First-year cornerstone courses introduce students to engineering through design projects, while capstone design courses seek to prepare seniors for the types of work they will encounter in their careers. While there is wide consensus on the importance of design in the curriculum, little extant research has investigated what it means to ‘do design’ across engineering disciplines. The picture is even muddier when different disciplinary engineering educators are asked to define what it means to ‘do design well.’

Developing a clear understanding of both engineering design fundamentals and distinctions between disciplines is necessary for students to choose majors, explore their interests, and succeed in subsequent design courses. The framing of engineering design in first-year courses and projects must prepare students for the variety of design processes they may encounter in their disciplinary courses.

This paper is part of a larger project that is innovating first-year engineering instruction to incorporate various conceptualizations of engineering design across the disciplines. In this study, we interviewed faculty who teach middle- and upper-level engineering design courses at a large, public university in the US. Responses from different engineering disciplines were qualitatively analyzed using the general engineering design framework from Pahl and Beitz (1984) and mapped into a preliminary framework. Our analysis seeks to answer the research question: How do different disciplines represent unique and common elements of engineering design in undergraduate courses? By analyzing how faculty define, teach, and assess design learning, we contribute to understanding disciplinary identity and the foundational elements of engineering design.

Authors
  1. Katherine Drinkwater Gregg Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [biography]
  2. Cassie Wallwey Orcid 16x16http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1318-1843 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [biography]
  3. Dr. Benjamin Daniel Chambers Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [biography]
  4. Matthew James P.E. Orcid 16x16http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1057-1048 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026