This paper examines students’ perceptions of a structured assignment resubmission policy implemented in an upper-level mechanical engineering vibrations course at a private, high-research-activity institution in the southern United States. The study extends prior work that investigated a similar resubmission policy in an introductory engineering course at the same institution. Using a pre-experimental research design with a post-course survey, we explored how resubmission opportunities influenced students’ experiences in the course. We further examined differences in perceptions between students encountering resubmission for the first time and those with prior experience under this practice. To provide broader context, findings from the upper-level course were compared with results from the earlier first-year course to examine how the perceived effects of resubmission practices evolve across academic levels within the same institutional context. The results contribute empirical insight into how resubmission practices are perceived by upper-level engineering students and highlight how prior exposure and academic standing shape students’ experiences with iterative assessment.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6205-8510
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach
[biography]
http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8440-236X
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
[biography]
http://orcid.org/https://0000-0002-5740-188X
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach
[biography]
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.