Sustainable engineering is one of the themes of the National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges and is of great interest and relevance in several engineering disciplines. ABET requirements for student outcomes in all engineering programs involve sustainable engineering topics through the consideration of environmental factors in engineering design [2]. Yet, sustainable engineering is often not discussed in required undergraduate courses in favor of emphasis on technical viability rather than application approaches that address these topics. Problem-based learning (PBL) has gained traction as a method to integrate education for sustainable development (ESD) into the undergraduate curriculum, however this method suffers from limited participant-directed learning, interdisciplinary knowledge, and collaboration [4]. As a result, the responsibility is often placed upon the students to take specialized, elective courses, which may not be available at many institutions [4]. Alternatively, students may engage in extracurricular student organizations to take part in experiential learning about sustainability outside of the classroom. At the University of Delaware, participation in the EWB student chapter is a popular way for students to learn about issues facing low-resource environments and gain firsthand experience working on sustainable engineering projects. This study aimed to understand how presenting sustainable engineering topics in different ways influenced undergraduate students’ interest, knowledge and confidence with the topic. Each of the teaching methods are expected to be successful in significantly increasing student interest, knowledge and confidence in sustainable engineering topics in the short term. Additionally, this study sought to determine how prior experiences and student demographics influenced the metrics of student engagement with topics in sustainable engineering.
Data were collected for this study by surveying undergraduate engineering students during a short seminar on sustainability in engineering. Three half-hour sessions of this seminar were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of three different teaching methods: teaching through literature review, teaching with a tactile aid, and teaching using a hybrid of the two methods. Each teaching method was employed at a separate seminar session. After analysis of the collected data, it was found that only the literature review was found to have a significant increase in all three metrics, rejecting the null hypothesis and suggesting it may be the best teaching method to achieve increases in the metrics in the short term. By the same tests, the tactile aid and hybrid teaching methods were found to have significant increases only in knowledge and confidence about sustainability. EWB student chapter membership versus non-membership was the only demographic category not showing inherent bias towards any specific group. It was determined that there was only a significant increase in the metric of knowledge from non-members to EWB student chapter members. In future studies, a more diverse and proportional set of subjects at various stages in their education and majors should be evaluated to better understand the relationship between the three metrics.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026