2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

From Body of Knowledge to Modular Implementation: A Faculty Learning Community Model for Graduate Chemical Engineering Reform

Presented at GSD Session 6: Discipline-Specific and Interdisciplinary Courses

Graduate STEM education remains largely grounded in a uniform, “one-size-fits-all” structure that prioritizes research depth over pedagogical adaptability. The University of Pittsburgh’s Swanson School of Engineering, supported by an NSF Innovations in Graduate Education (IGE) award, is addressing this gap through a modularized, one-credit curriculum and a personalized learning model (PLM) for graduate chemical engineering. This paper presents a case study of how a Faculty Learning Community (FLC) transformed a collaboratively developed body of knowledge (BOK) into a functioning modular curriculum. In this paper, we address the following research question: How can an FLC serve as a mechanism for implementing modular, personalized graduate curricula? Specifically, what mechanisms promote faculty adoption of this educational innovation?

Throughout the 2024–2025 academic year, faculty teaching the core chemical engineering courses: Thermodynamics, Kinetics, Transport, Safety and Ethics, and Mathematical Methods met monthly to interpret the BOK, identify implementation barriers, and co-design three-level, one-credit modules aligned with foundational, graduate, and specialized learning outcomes. Guided by educational research frameworks and supported by external evaluators, the FLC employed diffusion of innovation theory and Vygotsky's scaffolding principles to refine its instructional design iteratively. Monthly meeting themes evolved from analysis and planning to process mapping, learning on just-in-time teaching, and developing “day-to-day” module blueprints for the Fall 2025 pilot launch.

Early findings show that the FLC model effectively built community, fostered ownership, and lowered resistance to change while highlighting structural barriers, particularly in assessment alignment and inter-faculty coordination. Faculty surveys indicated high support for innovation but underscored the need for continued peer and administrative backing. The paper concludes by presenting the FLC’s replicable structure, facilitation practices, and assessment tools, positioning this approach as a scalable framework for translating conceptual curriculum redesign into sustainable instructional practice.

This case study paper contributes to ongoing national dialogue on reimagining graduate education by demonstrating how collaborative faculty learning structures can operationalize systemic reform, increase pedagogical flexibility, and advance personalized learning within and beyond engineering disciplines.

Authors
  1. Dr. Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre University of Pittsburgh [biography]
  2. Prof. Susan K Fullerton Shirey University of Pittsburgh [biography]
  3. Dr. Gary Lichtenstein Quality Evaluation Designs [biography]
  4. Dr. Götz Veser University of Pittsburgh
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026