Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT and Copilot are increasingly shaping how engineering students approach coursework, study routines, and conceptual learning. This study investigates undergraduate engineering students’ AI tool usage patterns and perceptions of AI-assisted learning, with an emphasis on learning support, critical thinking concerns, trust, and responsible use. Survey data were collected from 185 engineering students across multiple majors and academic levels. Descriptive analysis examined AI use frequency, purposes for AI use, and item-level attitudes measured using Likert-scale questions. A Composite AI Learning Attitudes Index was constructed from four aligned perception items, with reliability assessment performed using Cronbach’s alpha. Inferential testing included one-way ANOVA to compare composite attitudes across AI use frequency groups and multiple linear regression controlling for academic characteristics. Results indicate that AI tool use is widespread, with most students reporting at least occasional usage, primarily for homework support and exam preparation. Students generally agreed that AI tools improve understanding of course concepts, while many also expressed concern that overreliance could weaken critical-thinking skills. Trust in AI accuracy and ethical reliability remained moderate to low; however, strong support was observed for responsible AI integration in coursework. ANOVA and regression results showed that AI use frequency was a significant predictor of composite attitudes, with frequent users reporting substantially higher overall AI learning attitude scores than non-users. Findings suggest that engineering programs should adopt structured strategies for responsible GenAI integration that emphasize verification, critical thinking reinforcement, and AI literacy to support learning outcomes.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.