This methods full paper builds on recent work operationalizing engineering intuition by refining the Leveraging Intuition Towards Engineering Solutions (LITES) codebook. The LITES codebook identifies engineering intuition as an expert problem-solving skill used by practitioners. The original LITES codebook provided a structured starting point to capture engineering intuition use. Continued application of the codebook revealed coding discrepancies when used by coders outside the research team (new coders). These discrepancies highlighted the need to refine the original codebook to improve code clarity and maximize its utility for scholars beyond the research team. The purpose of this work was to refine the original codebook and examine the reliability of the refined codebook. The work was conducted in two phases. The first phase used a discussion-and-consensus approach, in which new coders compared and discussed their coding with experienced coders from the original research team. These discussions informed revisions to the code definition and coding instructions, provided examples for each code, and resulted in added notes to the application. The second phase examined the reliability of the refined LITES codebook using Cohen’s Kappa. Results showed an overall improvement in the refined codebook's reliability. The findings demonstrate that a structured discussion and consensus-based approach can improve code clarity and support more consistent application of codebooks beyond the original research team.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-6332
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Prescott
[biography]
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.