In this paper, we present a case study of multidisciplinary learning in a graduate-level modeling and simulation course. Here multidisciplinary learning refers to the integration and application of knowledge, methods, and perspectives from multiple disciplines to solve complex problems. In the context of modeling and simulation, this may involve combining statistical analysis, computer science, engineering principles, and domain-specific knowledge (mechanical engineering in our case study).
To assess the effectiveness of multidisciplinary learning, a mixed-methods approach is taken in our study, which combines quantitative survey data with qualitative project analysis. Based on the data that we have collected in the course on the fundamentals of the modeling and simulation, we aim to engage an in-depth study of the impact of multidisciplinary learning with following four research questions: (1) RQ1: How do students perceive the development of multidisciplinary competencies through modeling and simulation courses? (2) RQ2: How do course components, such as peer teaching, team projects, and homework, impact multidisciplinary learning? (3) RQ3: In what ways do student projects reflect the integration of knowledge and methods from multiple disciplines? (4) RQ4: What suggestions do students offer to improve the multidisciplinary learning experiences?
The first research question captures student perceptions of learning gains that are transferable across disciplines, even if not explicitly labeled as “multidisciplinary” in the survey. It invites analysis of both quantitative survey responses and qualitative open-ended feedback. The second research question allows us to explore which instructional strategies are most effective in fostering cross-disciplinary thinking and collaboration. It connects directly to the survey items on the usefulness of course components. The third research question focuses on analyzing project titles and descriptions to identify disciplinary diversity and integration. It provides indirect evidence of multidisciplinary learning in practice. The last research question points out areas of improvements in future offerings of the course.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.