2026 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

WIP: Reflection Trends in Sequential First-Year Engineering Courses

Presented at First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Poster Session

WIP: This Work in Progress Paper explores how reflection trends vary across two sequential first-year engineering (FYE) courses at a large Midwest Public University. While prior studies found association between reflective activities in undergraduate STEM classrooms and learning outcomes, investigating reflection trends between sequential FYE courses remains a relatively underexplored topic. In this study, we analyzed student reflections on what they found confusing and interesting from two sequential FYE courses, referred to as ENGR 101 (N=80) and ENGR 102 (N=68). We used a mobile application to prompt students to reflect on what they found confusing and interesting after every lecture during two academic semesters. We conducted text analysis to uncover and analyze emerging patterns in student reflections. We created an initial codebook using Chi and VanLehn’s physics self-explanation framework and modified our codebook along the coding process. Two coders conducted independent coding on a subset of reflections and calculated inter-rater reliability using Cohen’s κ. After establishing reliability, the validated codebook was applied to a larger reflection dataset using human coding alongside large language model (LLM) coding. We quantified code frequencies and compared their distributions across courses and reflection types.
Our preliminary findings indicate that ENGR 101 reflections exhibit a more balanced mix of conceptual and procedural content, with frequent mentions of statistics and Excel. In contrast, ENGR 102 reflections are dominated by technical procedures related to MATLAB programming and file management. Confusing reflections highlight conceptual hurdles in ENGR 101 and procedural challenges in ENGR 102, supporting prior observations that programming courses elicit more procedural confusion. These patterns suggest that reflection content systematically differs between sequential FYE courses, offering insight into how instructors may better scaffold the transition from statistical reasoning to computational problem-solving.

Authors
  1. Mr. Alfa Satya Putra Orcid 16x16http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0540-5819 Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering) [biography]
  2. Dr. Muhsin Menekse Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering) [biography]
  3. Muyang Wu Southern Methodist University (Department of Computer Science & Engineering) [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026

« View session

For those interested in:

  • engineering
  • undergraduate