Many institutions are currently grappling with teaching artificial intelligence (AI) in the face of growing demand and relevance in our world. Undergraduate institutions of all types and sizes are currently facing a capacity challenge in AI education, with shared problems and opportunities arising from this continuously developing disciplinary area. This paper discusses the results of 32 moderated virtual roundtable discussions of 202 experts committed to improving AI education, as part of a national project to advance AI education at undergraduate institutions throughout the United States. These discussions slot into four focus areas (1) AI Knowledge Areas and Pedagogy, (2) Infrastructure Challenges in AI Education, (3) Strategies to Increase Capacity in AI Education, and (4) AI Education for All. Roundtables were organized around institution type (e.g., R1, R2, Only Undergraduate, Community College, etc.) to consider the particular goals and resources of different tertiary AI education environments. We synthesized the thoughtful and informed roundtable discussions of experts in this report, both with respect to general AI education and to the particular needs of different institutions and positionalities. Together, these summarize the practices, challenges, and strategies institutions and individuals are exploring to improve AI education. In particular, we identified the following high-level community needs to increase capacity in AI education. A significant digital divide creates major infrastructure hurdles, especially for smaller and under-resourced institutions. These challenges manifest as a shortage of faculty with AI expertise, who also face limited time for reskilling; a lack of computational infrastructure for students and faculty to develop and test AI models; and insufficient institutional technical support. Compounding these issues is the large burden associated with updating AI curricula and creating new AI programs. To address the faculty gap, accessible and continuous professional development is crucial for faculty to learn about AI and its ethical dimensions. This support is particularly needed for under-resourced institutions and must extend to faculty both within and outside of computing programs to ensure all students have access to AI education. Further recommendations include specific curricular and community-based solutions. To streamline learning pathways, launching an Applied Math for AI course could avoid several burdensome prerequisites, while embedding ethics throughout the AI curriculum is essential. Pedagogically, using in-class assignments can provide valuable insight into student learning processes. Creating faculty learning communities can foster a supportive AI educational ecosystem and can bolster professional development, while establishing student clubs and makerspaces can provide vital, less formal environments for AI exploration and learning. We hope that our detailed findings and resources will lead to a robust and informed discussion on how to best serve our students as we adapt to the rapidly changing space in computing education to create a workforce of AI specialists.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 21, 2026, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 24, 2026