Sociotechnical innovation is wildly evident in the world around us from smart phones to workplace collaboration tools to electric cars. Yet, the fusion of the technical and social are often regarded as disparate entities where one of these constructs is often considered too late in the process often resulting in ramifications for the greater public. As an example, the purchase and use of electric cars has been incentivized by the government, providing tax breaks to citizens who purchase them in the goal of reducing our carbon footprint. However, the social ramifications of the supporting infrastructure’s capacity to produce an equitable distribution of efficient and reliable charging stations is less understood. In our lab, we desired to embark on a tiered mentoring research project at the intersection of engineering, technology, equity, justice and love, where engineering students across various identities, disciplines and statuses came together to investigate the shortcomings of innovation. Specifically, the goal of this effort would be to catalogue failed innovations over time in the form of a sociotechnical systems failure analysis to uncover the deeper connections to cultural beliefs, values, and norms. To go about this, the doctoral students in my lab and I wished to recruit a team of undergraduate engineers to join us in this work, and this is where the experiment began. We realized that we wanted to identify undergraduate engineers who were open to dissolving the imaginary boundaries of the social and technical to truly center the responsibility of engineering to people, society and the planet. Our experiment details the process by which we came to identify this team of engineers and our work in progress highlights that which we have since been able to explore and learn together. This work is novel in that the graduate students have led this process of identifying their cadre of innovators. The process of selecting the undergraduate students involved a first round of critical essay responses, a second round of interviewing with the team, and the establishment of rubrics at each step to prioritize that which was important in identifying the team to join in the work. This process has pushed the graduate students to weigh the values and questions that mattered most and to be able to recognize when these ideals were expressed in the applicants. Through this process, the team identified five undergraduate students to join our team in a quest for deeper sociotechnical understanding. We believe this work has created a beautiful, student driven process of identifying engineers that together innovate innovation in a way that can be translated and/or modeled to other contexts.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025