2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Improving Major Selection and Academic Trajectories: The Impact of a Common First-Year Engineering Orientation Course

Presented at First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 3: Session 3: Curriculum in Motion - Redesigning the First-Year Experience

This Complete Evidence-Based Practice paper studies the impact of Kennesaw State University’s new, 1 credit hour engineering orientation course, ENGR 1000, in increasing first-semester students’ confidence in their major choice. This course is part of the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering and Engineering Technology's new first-year common core curriculum, aimed at addressing the challenges faced by students who enter the university unsure of their major and precluding the challenges faced by students who later decide to change majors. ENGR 1000 introduces students to the various programs offered by the college and the resources available to support their academic journey. This is followed by a second semester, major-specific 1 credit hour laboratory course. ENGR 1000 is a 15-week course that is structured to provide both an introduction to the ten different engineering and engineering technology disciplines offered at the college and a roadmap for succeeding as a student in the college.

Each section of ENGR 1000 is taught by an instructor-of-record, who is responsible for guiding the students through the course material, managing grades via the university’s learning management system, shepherding student progress and communication, and addressing student issues. Note that students are not grouped together by their intended major, nor specifically placed with ENGR 1000 instructors in their intended major. During the first and last weeks of the semester, the instructor-of-record meets directly with the students, setting the tone for the course and helping them reflect on what they have learned. During week six, academic advisors join the class and the instructor-of-record to help students understand their degree plans, select appropriate courses for the following semester, and plan their academic trajectory. The active involvement of academic advisors ensures that students receive timely and relevant guidance, which is particularly important for those still uncertain about their major.

One of the course’s unique features is its integration of faculty presentations from across the six departments within the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering and Engineering Technology without an increase in the effective workload of any faculty member. During the remaining twelve weeks of the course, students see presentations about the programs offered within the college’s six departments, with instructors rotating between the various sections. Each department is allocated two weeks to introduce students to key concepts, career paths, and challenges specific to their discipline. These presentations aim not only to inform students about the various options available but also to inspire them through the faculty member’s passion for their field. This exposure helps students make more informed decisions about their academic and career paths, reducing the chances of major changes later that could delay graduation and increase costs due to untransferable credits. Students are assessed via attendance and the following six assignments: a virtual scavenger hunt, time management, resume building, professional licensing, engineering ethics, and an engagement assignment where they attend a college club meeting or seek college tutoring.

To evaluate the impact of the ENGR 1000 course, more than 1,500 students were administered brief surveys three times during the semester. The surveys focus on students' self-reported confidence and satisfaction with their chosen major, and their reflections on the course content and structure. Topics included demographics (age, race/ethnicity, gender, first-generation college student status, current math course, etc.), major choice, confidence in major choice (beginning and end of course), and impact of the orientation course on major choice and confidence at the end of the semester. Survey responses were de-identified prior to analysis. Methods of analysis include descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing to identify differences between student perceptions at different times in the semester.

Results yield insights into students’ confidence in selecting their major, and their expectations of what they hope to gain from the course. Additionally, potential obstacles are identified that may affect students’ progression toward graduation. The findings from this study will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of a common first-year engineering orientation course in supporting student success. By evaluating both student perceptions and academic outcomes, the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering and Engineering Technology at Kennesaw State University aims to continuously refine its curriculum to better serve its diverse student body and achieve its long-term goals of improving retention and graduation rates.

Authors
  1. Dr. Turaj Ashuri Kennesaw State University
  2. Prof. Lance Crimm Kennesaw State University [biography]
  3. Charles Richard Kennedy Kennesaw State University [biography]
  4. Dr. Margaret "Lori" L Lowder Kennesaw State University [biography]
  5. Dr. Matthew Quincy Marshall Kennesaw State University [biography]
  6. Dr. Christina R Scherrer Kennesaw State University [biography]
  7. Dr. Gregory L. Wiles PE Kennesaw State University [biography]
Note

The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025

« View session

For those interested in:

  • 1st Generation
  • Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology
  • engineering
  • engineering technology
  • Faculty
  • undergraduate