This research paper focuses on the impact of collaborations and networking on faculty from Minority Serving Institutions (MSI) preparation and submission of federal grant proposals. MSI often lack the infrastructure to support faculty attempting to prepare federal grants, and MSI faculty themselves may lack the experience and professional support that faculty in well-resourced research-intensive institutions typically have. Coupled with the racial disparity already present in federal funding agencies such as the National Science Foundation (NSF), faculty at MSI face compounding challenges in receiving external funding, leading to fewer MSI faculty receiving funding than those from research-intensive institutions. For this reason, the Engineering Education Research (EER) community has sought avenues to prioritize MSI faculty's support in preparing federal grant proposals, including collaboration. To understand the impacts of collaboration on MSI faculty, we investigated the following research question: To what extent does collaboration influence federal grant submissions for MSI faculty, and how can it be further supported?
We approach this question using data from MSI faculty who participated in the Capacity Building for Research at Minority Serving Institutions (CyBR-MSI) initiative, a collection of six programs funded by the NSF and implemented by the American Society for Engineering Education that were intended to boost the capacity of MSI faculty to prepare and submit competitive federal grant proposals. Utilizing a mixed methods approach through the lens of Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT), we analyzed both interview (n = 5) and survey data (n = 72) across a range of participating faculty from various MSI types. The results of our study provide evidence that faculty who indicated they expanded their network as an outcome of program participation also received higher numbers of federal grants after participation. Our qualitative results provide further evidence that MSI faculty were likely to submit more federal grant proposals when they collaborated with other MSI faculty outside of their home institution. Additional qualitative data on the CyBR-MSI initiative suggests that faculty can further benefit from more opportunities to network with MSI faculty who are experienced in obtaining federal funding. These results provide evidence for the value of building community and networking opportunities for MSI faculty who are preparing federal grant proposals. These results can further be used to support and refine programs that promote collaborations between MSI faculty within the engineering and STEM fields more broadly.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025