In this evidence-based practice paper, we examine a team-based exercise in developing and negotiating ethical standards for a hypothetical engineering company, designed to expose first-year engineering students to varying and competing moral perspectives among professionals in the engineering workplace without devoting class time to an overview of moral and ethical philosophy. This is done by leveraging the variety of moral perspectives already present within the classroom. Students reflect, then collaborate on a graphic representation of their company’s moral priorities. Our analysis explores the questions that student teams used to develop their priorities, the ways in which they were negotiated, and the ways in which they disagreed. The various themes present show that the exercise does indeed put students in a position where they are exposed to competing moral viewpoints, and can gain experience negotiating them. The results will also provide structure that can help guide planning and class discussions for instructors choosing to deploy a similar activity.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.