Abstract
Learning and problem-solving in the fields of environmental engineering and sustainability necessitate the formation of student groups in academic settings. Group performance varies. This study examined how different group formation methods affect individual student performance in a collegiate collaborative learning environment. Groups were divided randomly, by student selection, or by using the Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) System for Management, Assessment, Research, Training, Education, and Remediation (SMARTER) Teamwork tool by Purdue University. This study analyzed academic outcomes to determine how student group formation affected individual performance. The study found no statistically significant differences in individual performance between group formation methods. However, scores in all group types significantly improved between pre- and post-quizzes. That improvement indicated that collaborative learning positively impacted overall student performance. These findings suggest uncertainty about the extent to which educators can choose group formation methods without significantly affecting individual learning outcomes. This discussion also addresses the importance of other factors, such as group dynamics and instructional methods, in enhancing collaborative learning. Future research should explore additional group formation variables and unmeasured factors influencing group and individual performance.
I am an untenured faculty member within the first four years of total academic experience, lead author of the paper, and eligible for the Environmental Engineering Division Early Career Award.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025