Most technical engineering assessments are high stakes written exams where success as a student depends on finding correct, numerical answers to well-defined, single-solution problems. These problems are distinct from the ill-defined, open-ended problems of engineering work. To solve “real-world” engineering problems, students must develop the practices of engineers: the ability to interpret data, identify and conceptualize complex engineering problems, apply engineering judgment, and communicate with the broader engineering community. These practices align with current ABET accreditation requirements, but are not developed through traditional assessment. This practitioner paper focuses on the experiences of course instructors as they worked with an engineering education researcher to implement short, oral, authentic exams in a medium-sized (~65 students) undergraduate manufacturing course. These oral exams replicated engineering practice by initiating manufacturing design and data interpretation conversations between students and instructors that required application of course concepts and engineering judgment. Both successes and opportunities for improvement are documented. Reflections on question choice, creating positive student-instructor interaction, student buy-in, grading, and personal time management are designed to help curious educators determine if this type of assessment is right for their courses.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025