This study aims to introduce and evaluate a peer assessment method as a complementary approach to Slack-based engagement assessment in face-to-face group work. The participants were students who attended a Japan-Thailand joint global project-based learning (PBL) workshop held in 2024. Posts made on Slack were classified into three types—A, B, and C—according to their level of contribution. Additionally, students conducted peer assessments using a four-point Likert scale to evaluate contributions across three dimensions: idea generation, discussion, and task execution. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the number of Type A posts on Slack had a significant positive correlation with peer-assessed contributions in both idea generation and task execution. However, no significant relationship was observed with discussion. Furthermore, Type C posts had a significant negative impact on task execution. These findings indicate that while Slack-based evaluation has certain validity even in face-to-face settings, it has limitations in capturing oral discussions, which are less likely to be documented.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025