This study investigated how structured AI implementation affects student-instructor interactions and student perceptions in an undergraduate geotechnical engineering course. The research compared an intervention group that was highly encouraged to use AI and received structured AI guidance with a control group with no formal AI integration or encouragement. Through pre- and post-course surveys, findings revealed that structured implementation helped maintain student confidence in using AI as a learning tool, while students without guidance showed decreased confidence. Statistical analysis of final grades showed no significant differences between groups, suggesting that while the implementation approach influenced student perceptions, it did not directly impact academic performance. Students across all sections expressed concerns about AI’s reliability for technical calculations and the balance between AI assistance and traditional learning methods. The results indicate that while implementation approach significantly influences both student confidence and classroom dynamics in technical courses, careful consideration must be given to how these changes translate to measurable learning outcomes.
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on June 22, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on June 25, 2025