In the last two decades, engineering education researchers have increasingly explored the traits of engineering students with ADHD (either formally or informally diagnosed), moving from deficit-based framings of students with ADHD to asset-based framings of the valuable characteristics individuals with ADHD bring to the engineering enterprise. However, while some investigations analyze the experiences of ADHD-having engineering students, few investigations center the narratives of ADHD-having engineering practitioners (faculty and students) to unravel how dominant discourses of disability and ADHD affect their engineering pathways. Further rendering those discourses invisible, disability is stigmatized, and open discussions of neurodivergence and disability are less prevalent, leading to an inability to understand how individuals with ADHD navigate engineering ecosystems. We have two main objectives in this paper: 1) critically analyze asset and deficit-based framings of ADHD and disability in engineering, and 2) create and disseminate qualitative elicitation questions to create counterstories from individuals with ADHD. This work forms part of a larger project to answer the following research question through the lens of crip theory: Can we reconceptualize ADHD in engineering beyond deficit frameworks through critical methods that uncover and question hegemonic discourses and the power those discourses have?
The full paper will be available to logged in and registered conference attendees once the conference starts on February 9, 2025, and to all visitors after the conference ends on February 11, 2025