Service-learning programs emphasizing engineering design are frequently recognized for their potential to enhance the professional development of students. Such programs, when viewed from a systems perspective, consist of intricate networks of interconnected components including students, instructors, teaching assistants, community and corporate partners, and university staff, among others. Central to the functioning of these programs, Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) have been traditionally viewed not as service users, but rather as integral components of the service itself, actively contributing to a conducive environment for community engagement and learning. This foundational assumption, therefore, has often overshadowed the importance of evaluating and enhancing the experiences of the GTAs themselves, even though these experiences significantly influence the overall success of service-learning programs. GTAs play a crucial role in these programs, often overlooked as they contribute to the program's success. This study takes a user-centric mixed-method approach to comprehensively evaluate GTAs' experiences within service-learning programs.
Conducted at a Midwestern US institution, this research combines surveys, stakeholder interviews, and ethnographic observations. Thirteen GTAs from various engineering disciplines participated. The aim is to understand their motivations, challenges, and stresses, identifying areas for program improvement and valuable outcomes. Pre-semester feedback indicates that while many GTAs are confident in time management and public speaking, several find these skills challenging. They express a desire to enhance communication and student coaching skills. Returning GTAs have specific goals, such as leadership development and providing better student feedback. This research underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing GTAs' unique needs within service-learning program evaluation. By identifying GTA expectations and experiences, the study also highlights the acquisition of multidisciplinary skills, promoting individual growth. The evaluation framework introduced can serve as a model for other institutions and programs, emphasizing the significance of an empathetic, user-centric approach in academic settings.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.