This research delves into the paradigm shift of integrating a 'fail-forward learn-fast' innovation mindset within engineering education, emphasizing the transformative potential of reflective failure journaling. The 'fail-forward learn-fast' mindset advocates for viewing failures as stepping stones to rapid learning and subsequent improvement, a pivotal approach in the iterative nature of engineering innovation. In our "Innovation Through Making" course at the Engineering Sciences 2000-level, our study investigates the impact of incentivizing failure documentation and reflection within multidisciplinary student teams over an 8-week period. Encompassing a sample size of 51 students spanning two course offerings, this paper elaborates on the pedagogy and insights garnered from the students' Failure Journals, culminating with a survey assessing their perceived learning gains.
The course, characterized by its hands-on approach to digital fabrication and entrepreneurial mindset cultivation, employs a novel 'Failure Journal' component. This tool propels students to meticulously document, reflect on, and learn from iterative setbacks encountered during the prototyping phase of engineering solutions, thus nurturing resilient and adaptive learning. Culminating in a competitive Prototype Showcase aligned with sustainable development goals, students pitch their innovations and are assessed, mirroring real-world entrepreneurial endeavors.
Our methodology involved qualitative thematic analysis of journal entries and quantitative evaluation of self-reported learning gains, seeking correlations between the acceptance of failure and subsequent innovation quality. Results indicate a positive shift in students' perspectives on failure, reflecting improvements in risk-taking, resilience through setbacks, and project innovation. These findings suggest that early academic exposure to a fail-forward mindset demystifies failure and fosters a growth mindset integral for future engineering innovators.
This study underscores the need for immersive strategies that advocate for a systemic shift that nurtures not only technically proficient engineers, but also resilient innovators poised to address complex, real-world challenges sustainably. Further research is recommended to evaluate the long-term impact of this educational approach on professional competency in diverse engineering domains.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.