The advent of digital engineering practices across industries and defense organizations has created a need for graduating engineers to acquire skills in conceptualizing and creating digital models that capture the lifecycle of the product, system, or service of interest. The transition from traditional document-based models to digital models requires training in modeling languages and modeling methods to apply model-based systems engineering (MBSE) tools and techniques. These pillars are essential to designing digital models and employing a systems-thinking framework. Digital engineering skills focusing on MBSE topics are currently not widely available in undergraduate or graduate programs. We propose a modular approach for integrating these topics in a set of core courses in the second and third years of the engineering curriculum, building incremental skills across this two-year period, and leading to their application in capstone design projects in the final year. The modules are drawn from a recently implemented Digital Engineering graduate certificate for training a civilian Air Force cohort. This twelve-credit certificate included four semester-long courses in: (i) Systems, Models and Simulation for Digital Engineering; (ii) Model-Based Systems Engineering; (iii) Cyber-Physical Systems and Simulation; and (iv) Data-Driven Decision-Making and Risk Management. The modules are hosted on an online learning and course management system. Each module includes an experiential learning project that supports designing use cases with relevant stakeholders, conducting interviews with non-engineering domain-experts and end users of the system or creating digital models using systems modeling languages such as the Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) and the Systems Modeling Language (SysML). We pay particular attention to ensuring engineers learn to incorporate a human-centric approach in systems modeling, fostering a holistic and user-centric design process. This paper presents one example of a case study that introduces students to concepts of stakeholders, use cases and requirements analysis. The example takes the student through a sequence of stages using tools provided by UAF and SysML. These architectural platforms provide structure, but also include several degrees of freedom in design choices, allowing students to exercise and be assessed on the requisite systems thinking competency.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.