Adaptive Comparative Judgment (ACJ) is an assessment method that facilitates the holistic evaluation of entities, including student assignments. It entails a comparison between pairs of items to identify the superior one. This study explores the application of ACJ in Learning by Evaluating (LbE), which extends the ACJ process by incorporating student comments. This not only allows students to engage with the items but also enhances their understanding through the act of commenting.
In partnership with a diverse school district in the Southern United States, researchers engaged with high school students and instructors from the Foundations of Engineering and Technology course, a preliminary module for the Engineering and Technology Education pathways. With informed consent, teachers integrated LbE into their curriculum, specifically in the realm of engineering design comparisons. This integration took place prior to the students' engineering design projects, enabling students to engage with and critique designs from their predecessors.
The 5E instructional model, commonly termed as the 5Es, encompasses five phases: 1) Engagement, 2) Exploration, 3) Explanation, 4) Elaboration, and 5) Evaluation. Each stage serves a distinct purpose, fostering coherent instruction from educators and facilitating students in acquiring a more nuanced comprehension of scientific and technological concepts, attitudes, and competencies.
Given the widespread adoption of the 5E model in engineering education, our research aims to examine how educators embed the novel design artifact comparison approach, LbE, into this established instructional framework. Through content analysis, the study seeks to understand the nuances of LbE deployment in classrooms and its efficacy in promoting substantive student learning.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.