Professional and design skill development is an essential part of engineering education (Hadgraft & Kolmos, 2020), yet, according to industry feedback, many students struggle to satisfactorily develop these skills during their time as undergraduates (Hirudayaraj 2021, Kolmos & Hoolgard, 2019). Despite numerous approaches to improve students’ preparedness for the work environment through academia-industry collaborations (see Shah & Gillen, 2023), the perceptions of industry experts on strengths and weaknesses of current senior engineering students remain mainly unspecified in the literature. In this work, we are using a systematic approach and framework to examine the research question, “What are the industry perspectives on assessed strengths and challenges related to professional and engineering design skills of bioengineering seniors?”
Building on prior coursework, the senior design capstone experience provides students with the opportunity to apply concepts and develop important skills necessary for transition to their professional careers. In the bioengineering undergraduate programs at [name of institution], the senior design experience culminates with an event called Bioengineering Day (BE-Day), in which senior students present posters on their design project. Students have the unique opportunity to interact one-on-one with industrial professionals to discuss their projects. After visiting with students at their posters, industry judges are asked to provide feedback on specific performance indicators, such as visual and oral communication, engineering design, and self-management skills. In this study, we investigated which skills were cited as a strength of senior bioengineering students and which skills need improvement. Coupling hierarchical clustering with industry reviews from two consecutive years, we analyzed industry feedback on aspects of student performance in senior design projects, extracting distinct skill subsets. By applying the Euclidean distance metric and average linkage method, we produced visualizations – a heatmap and dendrogram – for categorizing students' skills based on industry-specific criteria.
Results indicated that the highest-scoring performance indicators included the overall quality of the posters and oral presentations. Furthermore, students excelled at verbal communication and professional behavior. Students also demonstrated excellence in describing the background and needs of their project. Areas for improvement were consistent between years and included students’ abilities to describe the “limitations of their work”. Industry professionals also rated students’ “ability to implement their work as proposed” as relatively lower than other performance indicators. Here, we gain an understanding of industry perspectives on senior design skill development that will help inform curricular improvements to close the gap between industry expectations and academic preparation of engineering graduates.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.