Introduction: In recent years, the emphasis on global experiences for undergraduates has increased. Institutions and educators have worked to create more opportunities for international collaboration for students including Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL), a pedagogical method that allows for a deepened global engagement for students without the need for international travel. The COIL method connects students and faculty from different countries to explore a subject, theme, issue, or idea through a project-based learning experience. COIL presents many opportunities for virtual engagement as a solution for lack of student mobility, as emphasized throughout the pandemic. Our university has expanded on COIL by offering full-semester COIL courses with an optional post-course short term study abroad program. This type of experience is referred to as COIL+. Currently, little research is available that seeks to understand how these experiences impact students. Student learning outcomes are compared between students participating in a COIL+ and traditional short-term study abroad programs.
Objective: The objective of this study was to qualitatively analyze undergraduate students’ COIL+ experiences between traditional short-term programming to quantify and evaluate associated benefits, pitfalls, and opportunities.
Methods: We conducted in-depth focus groups with eight questions in groups ranging from 1-16 students to understand their experience in the program and at the University since completion of the program. These groups were guided by a student moderator and lasted in length without restriction as long as students provided feedback to questions. We analyzed the transcripts from the focus groups using an inductive approach to coding the data to uncover themes.
Preliminary Results: Preliminary results suggest that students discussed the following themes: future educational and career outlooks, class applications, cultural interaction and exchange, cultural intelligence, skill development, and advice to other students considering similar learning experiences. Our draft paper will discuss these results, comparing and contrasting with results from other studies.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.