This paper is a rapid ethnographic assessment of six workshops on intercultural competence, community-engaged practice, and qualitative data analysis, which were designed for and offered to graduate students in different academic backgrounds. The intent of the workshops is to foster transdisciplinary education that leads to stronger solution-seeking processes in the face of intensifying climate change and efforts to sustain and enhance life on earth. The workshops are part of a U.S. National Science Foundation-funded project, which was awarded to scientists from anthropology, education, and engineering. Participants in the first cohort included master’s and doctoral students from psychology, counseling, sociology, environmental engineering, industrial engineering, mechanical engineering, and sustainable energy engineering. During the workshops, participants enacted a number of dynamic simulations and role plays as future transdisciplinary environmental professionals facing unprecedented challenges. Workshop elements included mapping your cultural orientation, positioning values along a spectrum, theorizing plateaus of adult and organizational development, analyzing interactions, identifying principles of community-engaged practice, completing community engagement plan components, utilizing qualitative research tools including interviewing and coding, and analyzing qualitative data. Interactive practices were deployed to simulate embracing radical differences and care (e.g., talking stick, consensus-seeking discussions and decision-making, and Johari window). The workshops provided opportunities for participants to engage in ways to understand their own cultural positioning, each other, and diverse ethnolinguistic marginalized communities that often suffer the most from the deleterious effects of climate change. The paper will present the general design and structure of the six workshops and report the results from rapid ethnographic assessment of the performance of the first cohort who completed the workshops. Ongoing participant validation strategies were deployed through dialogic engagement which the paper reports from inductive coding and analysis of student class notes, interviews, and workshop planning.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.