Over the ten-year period from 2011 to 2020, a major research-based Canadian university experienced a 5% increase in female enrollment in postgraduate engineering programs, exceeding the national average. Nonetheless, an intriguing discrepancy emerges when juxtaposed with the 15% surge in female undergraduate enrollment during the same period. Such a disparity underscores a significant potential for bolstering women's transition from undergraduate to graduate studies. Capitalizing on this latent pool of female undergraduates could further propel gender equity in the university's engineering program.
This paper delves into the demographic determinants influencing students' inclination towards graduate studies, assessing the nuances of gender, citizenship status, disability, race, sexual orientation, and family education. The presented findings emanate from the fourth phase of an extensive multiphase mixed-method research project. The project seeks to elucidate the impediments that underrepresented students, particularly women, face in pursuing graduate engineering degrees and the potential solutions to overcome those barriers.
Our methodology in this phase encompassed a comprehensive mixed-method survey, garnering responses from over 600 undergraduate and graduate engineering students within the Engineering Faculty. Preliminary analyses revealed that the decision to pursue graduate studies is influenced by intersectional identity variables.
In the sphere of engineering education, the pursuit of diversity, inclusion, and equity has long been recognized as imperative, yet the representation and participation of women and minority groups in graduate degrees remains a pressing concern. A significant hindrance has been Canada's erstwhile data collection methodologies, which have not robustly and systematically captured granular demographic information about students' race, disability, sexual orientation, and familial backgrounds. This has historically stymied a detailed intersectional analysis of engineering students' experiences and the factors driving their post-undergraduate academic choices. This research facilitates a more discerning examination of intersectional influences by meticulously incorporating these crucial demographic variables into our comprehensive survey and analyzing the responses from a substantial cohort of engineering students. The results enrich the academic literature on equitable engineering graduate recruitment and retention, adding layers of complexity and depth.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.