2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Pathways to Entrepreneurship (PAtENT): Addressing the National Academies Recommendations

Presented at Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 2: Graduate Student Pipeline and Workforce Development

Pathways to Entrepreneurship (PAtENT): Addressing the National Academies Recommendations

Though the field of engineering has experienced significant changes over the last several decades, many graduate programs have not made any substantive changes in their curriculum. This is particularly important given that data show that over sixty percent of new doctorate program graduates do not go into academic research [1]. Recognizing the critical need for change, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [2] made recommendations for graduate STEM education programs. The intent was to examine how graduate STEM education can focus on evidence-based practices which better respond to the needs of students and broader society. The Committee on Revitalizing Graduate STEM Education identified key competencies for educational systems so that they are dynamic in addressing current needs of students while anticipating future contexts in STEM graduate education. These competencies were the framework for this research which employed curriculum analysis methods to the PAtENT (Pathways to Entrepreneurship) program, an alternate pathway to the doctorate in engineering. The curriculum analysis included the two components of the Academies’ recommendations: 1) Develop scientific and technological literacy and conduct original research and 2) Develop leadership, communication, and professional competencies. The research used a dimensional core curriculum analysis [3 - 4] to analyze program information including documents, artifacts, and other data related to coursework, original research, student classroom experiences as well as laboratories and fieldwork. The descriptive content analysis used a systematic process to allow for identifying attributes within documents and data in order to align identified components to program activities and structures. Coding for the curriculum analysis used an inductive, thematic and descriptive approach in aligning program components and activities to 10 elements listed for the 2 components in the Academies’ recommendations. Document analysis identified curriculum expectations and program outcomes that were tagged to the elements in the recommendations. The goal of this research was to identify PAtENT program activities and features that best addressed a particular element. Procedures followed key processes from curriculum study methodology including identifying desired outcomes, determining what content and activities contributed to those outcomes, and identifying experiences developed to result in those intended outcomes [5 - 7]. This systematic process identified attributes and components of PAtENT program features that aligned to the ten elements.

Authors
  1. Dr. David K. Pugalee Orcid 16x16http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3356-1600 University of North Carolina at Charlotte [biography]
  2. Dr. Mesbah Uddin Orcid 16x16http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2945-6744 University of North Carolina at Charlotte [biography]
  3. Dr. H. P. Cherukuri University of North Carolina at Charlotte [biography]
  4. Prof. Terry Xu University of North Carolina at Charlotte [biography]
Download paper (2.08 MB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.