This study introduces a “3P” model—Policy, Pedagogy, and Practice—to address the need to tackle the difficulties of current engineering curricula to adapt to the rapidly evolving demands of the industry. A mixed-method approach is employed, which combines quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews with industry professionals, policymakers, and educators. This methodology provides a holistic view of the interactions between national energy policies, industry needs, and educational strategies. Key findings highlight a significant gap in current engineering curricula, primarily due to ineffective pedagogical strategies and delayed curriculum updates. The proposed “3P” model, with the key enablers and barriers identified, can serve as a framework to integrate policy-informed competencies, innovative pedagogy, and industry-relevant skills into engineering education, which points out the necessity for rapid adaptation in educational institutions to match industry advancements. The study also explores the model’s transferability across various engineering disciplines to demonstrate its broad applicability. Recommendations focus on enhancing industry-academia collaboration, clear policy interpretation, continuous professional development for engineering academics, and strategic curriculum updates.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.