In May, 2023 the RACIAL EQUITY CENTER NAME HERE (referred to as “the Center” hereafter) convened the inaugural meeting of its advisory board (AB). Twelve AB members, all with a demonstrated commitment to advancing racial equity within engineering were present. The AB was constructed with intentionality to include a variety of roles within the engineering educational ecosystem, a variety of racial / ethnic identities, a variety of sexuality identities, a variety of gender identities, and a variety of institutional homes. Professional roles represented by AB members in attendance at the meeting include: doctoral student, faculty at all ranks, college level administrator, university level administrator, entrepreneur, and nonprofit organization executive. Along with the AB members, four internal Center team members were in attendance: the Center’s founding executive director, associate director, and two graduate student team members.
The meeting spanned three days and had the following high level objectives: refine the Center priorities and initial activities, generate ideas for a sustainability plan that positions the Center to thrive financially at the end of its fifth year, generate ideas for a human infrastructure plan to support the center, and inform a plan and structure for continued engagement between the Center and the AB.
This paper will report on a subset of the meeting activities and outcomes as related to the refinement of the Center’s priorities. Specifically, the AB and Center team members collaboratively engaged in a structured process, designed to elucidate the group’s collective vision about the issues of greatest opportunity and urgency in creating an anti-racist and equitable future for engineering. The outcome of the experience yielded the following fourteen priorities and opportunities (listed in no particular order): 1) building empathy in engineers; 2) broadening influence on what engineers learn, do, and recognize as engineering problems; 3) decolonizing engineering values; 4)increasing equity, transparency, and accountability in academic / university policies; 5) making the invisible (labor, time, harm, etc.) of Black engineers and engineering scholars visible; 6) removing the perceived threat of equity; 7) recognizing the harm of technological innovation; 8) changing the conversation (messaging) about engineering...again; 9) engagement as a pathway across the lifespan of an engineer; 10) rethinking assessment; 11) valuing reproducibility as a key component of equity-driven innovations; 12) removing money as an impediment to engineering graduate studies; 13) requiring equity as standard and required learning for everyone within the engineering ecosystem; and 14) normalizing wellness as a fundamental right for engineering scholars.
The full paper will include details around the process used to generate the fourteen opportunity and priority areas as well as a detailed description of each of the opportunities and priorities themselves. Our intention in sharing the outcome of this activity at CoNECD is to move beyond these priorities to solely inform the activities of the Center. We wish to share the emergent opportunities and priorities toward serving as a resource for other equity-focused scholars and practitioners desiring to impact transformative change in their respective institutions.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.