2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Redesigning the Course and Teacher Ratings: Methods, Outcomes, and Lessons Learned

Presented at Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4

Less than one year into the COVID-19 pandemic, the provost and faculty union leadership at a midsized private university agreed that the time was right for a reevaluation of the student evaluation of teaching (SET) process and policy. A university-wide Blue Ribbon Committee was formed to evaluate simultaneously the SET and the peer observation processes and policies and to make recommendations as appropriate. The committee researched and compared “name-of” University (U) standards and processes to peer and aspirant institutions, as well as best practices to prevent bias in responses from students.

The initial meeting of the Committee occurred on December 17, 2020 with members representing each of the schools at the University as well as the offices of the Provost and Institutional Research. Our diverse committee agreed on three guiding principles (a) Update the CTR to make it a more useful instrument for faculty development; (b) Include items that capture student perceptions of class climate; (c) Broaden the scope of teaching behaviors assessed to reflect the broad range of course structures and effective teaching styles of our faculty.

To date, the committee has assessed, revised, proposed, and piloted questions for the CTRs. The committee has also tested numerous roll-out plans to optimize student response. The outcomes, results, and lessons learned from these efforts will be shared in this paper.

Authors
  1. S. Stavros Valenti Hofstra University
  2. Kevin Patrick Nolan Hofstra University
Download paper (812 KB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.