2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Diversity Index: A New Perspective on Engineering Capstone Projects

Presented at Diversity Trainings, Inclusive Learning, and Distance Learning

Capstone courses in engineering usually lead to projects where student teams show their skills at providing engineering solutions for realistic problems, making use of the knowledge and training acquired through the entire college curriculum, and demonstrating student readiness to enter the job market or moving into research. These projects are often displayed at venues where judges from academia and industry conduct evaluations to assess those achievements. Grading rubrics are generally based on the engineering approach, ability to reach a solution, specific design content, innovation, team performance, and presentation and communication skills. It has become popular that these showcases turn into competitions, with prizes and recognitions awarded to selected projects. In this study, we took an additional perspective on these capstone courses and events by analyzing the composition of these teams in terms of diversity and the potential impact of this factor in the performance and results. We took occasion of a large presentation of over 100 capstones projects by the Class of 2022 at the University of [blank], with the participation of more than 500 senior students, to assess the diversity of teams across the various departments of the School of Engineering. An additional population of almost 100 senior students from a department that does not participate in the event but with a comparable capstone project was also included in the study. The evaluation of the projects was conducted by instructors and expert judges from industry and academia. Trends were examined between performance grades versus a diversity index, which metrics and characteristics were previously reported. The diversity of the self-selected team members (most commonly 4-6), as measured by this diversity index, reveals a marked trend to decreasing the diversity of the former group (i.e., class, course), exposing some probable implicit biases on identity. Some other results show how diversity impacts team performance differently depending on the prevalent characteristic of the group. The analysis provided in this paper offers criteria and methodology applicable to institutions and situations to quantitatively assess diversity that can lead to practical guidelines and even policies.

Authors
  1. John Andrew Keith University of Pittsburgh [biography]
Download paper (1.2 MB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.